中国A片

UK universities face strikes as UCU calls ballot in pay dispute

Union faces challenge to pass turnout threshold as sector finance crisis mounts

十二月 13, 2024
UCU picket banner placard
Source: Tom Williams

UK universities could face strikes in the new year, after the main sector union voted to ballot for industrial action over pay.

The poll, agreed on by the University and College Union’s 中国A片 committee, focuses on the Universities and Colleges Employers Association’s offer of a rise of between 2.5 and 5.7 per cent.

The decision comes after a consultative ballot in which union members rejected the pay offer by 68 per cent to 32 per cent, with 53 per cent saying that they would be prepared to take industrial action.

A UCU spokesperson said: “UCU’s 中国A片 committee met yesterday to agree the union’s next steps following the result of the consultative ballot and has agreed to launch a statutory industrial action ballot in the new year over pay.”

More strike action would come on top of walkouts and marking boycotts spanning several years in disputes over pay, pensions and working conditions.

But whether UCU will be able to secure support for a walkout remains to be seen. Thousands of jobs are expected to be axed across the UK 中国A片 sector in coming months amid a mounting financial crisis, and employers are likely to warn that any further expenditure on salaries would translate into increased redundancies.

And the last round of strikes came to an end when only 43 per cent of members voted in a ballot, missing the 50 per cent minimum turnout requirement.

The new Labour government has?pledged to repeal the Conservative-era law which demands this level of turnout, but is yet to act upon this promise.

Ucea highlighted that the consultative ballot had a turnout of only 27 per cent of members, and so represented about 8 per cent of the total academic workforce.

Raj Jethwa, the employer association’s chief executive, said that the union’s decision to call a ballot was “deeply disappointing”.

“While the result is hardly a surprise, it is not necessarily representative of the views of staff working in the sector, including UCU’s own membership,” Mr Jethwa said.

“Employers can genuinely relate to frustrations about sector funding and finances, but industrial action over a pay uplift that will not and cannot change will not provide a solution.”

Mr Jethwa warned that the ballot could “undermine” joint work under way with all five sector unions on addressing issues relating to workload and equality pay gaps, as well as a review of the pay spine. Ucea has said that this work was contingent on unions not balloting for industrial action.

Most universities have already paid an opening ?900 instalment of this year’s pay rise, with the rest due in March. But a record number of institutions have?opted to delay the pay increase, citing financial pressures.

Meanwhile UCU’s own staff who are members of the Unite union have just completed three days of strike action, in a dispute with managers?that includes a row over pay negotiations. Unite members are balloting for further industrial action.

chris.havergal@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.

Reader's comments (4)

There is an incredible amount of money squandered in UK HE on bloated bureaucracy and orgies of form-filling, form counting, form checking, form chasing etc.. All done in the name of “quality assurance” but actually delivering nothing but waste and mediocrity.
100% agreed. Too many bureaucrats with negative value added. Budgets should be distributed direct to departments who then employ the administrative support they need. There needs to be mass sackings of excess senior management teams and their associated mini empires. Often the senior managers each employ 3 to 4 people to do the work they should actually be doing themselves. Sae with Deans there used to be one now it is one dean with 6 associate deans who do the job previously done by the Dean. Mass sackings are needed.
I agree. Unfortunately, the mass sacking will of course hit the frontline admin and academic staff first and foremost as usual. The managerial class and bureaucracy are very skilful in protecting their own, I am afraid.
Perhaps if more academic colleagues actually did as they were asked and acted on feedback the quality would improve - unfortunately whoever you work for there is still a need to evidence assurance and compliance with regulatory requirements. Roles at all levels in Professional Services and Senior Management are already disappearing under restructures that are taking place. How many and how much just varies according to institution. UCU does seem to have a different agenda to its members which is an interesting disconnect given they claim to represent them.
ADVERTISEMENT