The chair of the UK research councils¡¯ new umbrella body has given weight to suggestions that it could withdraw funding from universities?that fail to effectively combat bullying and harassment in academia.

Sir John Kingman, chair of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), told Times ÖйúAƬ that the organisation had ¡°an appetite to be radical¡± in its mission to cultivate a fairer and more inclusive research environment.

Sir John, whose organisation combines the seven councils with Innovate UK and Research England, which distributes quality-related support for research, said that UKRI was developing its position on bullying and harassment, ¡°including?such questions as?what hard requirements and conditions of funding should?be in this area¡±.

¡°We are developing our approach,¡± he said. ¡°That approach must make a real difference and we will ensure that it does.¡±

ÖйúAƬ

Sir John¡¯s comments followed a speech by?Sir Mark Walport, UKRI¡¯s chief executive, in which he announced a series of reviews of research culture, including one targeting bullying and harassment.

¡°We recognise that bullying and harassment is an acute problem in the sector and one that we must address,¡± Sir Mark told a Royal Society conference. ¡°We have a range of options available to deal with bullying in the research community¡­We could require disclosure of any allegations at the point of grant application, and we could impose sanctions, ranging from best practice training for staff, through to the removal and reallocation of funding when requirements are not met or allegations have been upheld.¡±

ÖйúAƬ

The interventions come amid a series of high-profile complaints against senior leaders in the research community, most recently involving Sir Mike Stratton, director of the Wellcome Sanger Institute. Last week an independent inquiry cleared Sir Mike of bullying and sexism claims made by 10 former and current staff members, but he .

Last month a leading geneticist, Nazneen Rahman, at the Institute of Cancer Research after the Wellcome Trust revoked ?3.5 million of her funding following allegations that she had bullied colleagues.

Sir John said that while he could not comment on individual cases, the UKRI board was ¡°very clear that these behaviours are completely unacceptable¡± and that the organisation had ¡°a duty to prevent these incidents, and to take appropriate action¡±.

He also said that addressing the factors that lie behind a lack of diversity within the research community would be vital for the UK to achieve the goals of the government¡¯s industrial strategy. Sir John said that meeting the targets would require ¡°the equivalent of 150,000 more researchers¡± and that a more inclusive working environment could help stem the attrition of female researchers.

ÖйúAƬ

¡°If we could fix the gender gap that would be the biggest single thing we could do to make a difference to UK R&D,¡± Sir John said.

rachael.pells@timeshighereducation.com