Union members have voted overwhelmingly in favour of strike action over changes to UK ÖйúAƬ¡¯s biggest pension scheme.

Eighty-eight per cent of University and College Union members who took part in the ballot voted to walk out after Universities UK proposed scrapping the element of Universities Superannuation Scheme that guarantees a certain level of pension income in retirement.

UCU said that, if a deal cannot be reached, 14 days of strike action would be held at the 61 universities where ballots met the 50 per cent turnout threshold required for any strike action,?starting with a two-day walkout on 22 and 23 February.

This would escalate to three-day, four-day and five-day strikes in subsequent weeks.

ÖйúAƬ

Of the 58 per cent of members who voted, 93 per cent backed action short of a strike, which is set to include refusing to cover classes or reschedule classes lost to strike days, as well as refusing to undertake any voluntary duties.

About 190,000 staff in mainly pre-92 institutions are members of USS.

ÖйúAƬ

Sally Hunt, the UCU¡¯s general secretary, said that members had ¡°made it quite clear they are prepared to take action to defend their pensions and the universities need to work with us to avoid widespread disruption¡±.

Universities will be hit with levels of strike action not seen before on UK campuses if a deal cannot be done over the future of USS pensions," she said. "Even at this late stage we urge universities to work with us to reach an agreement that protects the defined benefit element of USS pensions."

Talks involving UUK and UCU are currently scheduled to finish on 23 January.

At present, the USS operates a hybrid scheme in which defined benefit pensions can be accumulated on salaries up to ?55,550, with earnings above this threshold directed towards a defined contribution scheme, under which retirement incomes depend solely on returns from money invested in the stock market.

UUK¡¯s proposal would move the entirety of members¡¯ earnings on to a defined contribution model, in a bid to close a deficit that USS estimates to be ?7.5 billion.

A spokeswoman for UUK described the ballot result as ¡°disappointing¡±.

¡°A solution to the significant funding challenges facing USS needs to be found,¡± she said. ¡°UUK¡¯s priority is to put USS on a secure and sustainable footing while offering attractive, market-leading pensions ¨C the very best that can be afforded by both employers and employees.??

¡°We should be under no illusion, this is not a problem that will go away if ignored.?To retain the status quo would only serve interests in the short term.?Without reform now, universities will likely be forced to divert funding allocated from research and teaching to fill a pensions funding gap. The option of no reform is a dangerous gamble. It is a risk that employers cannot take.¡±

ÖйúAƬ

ÖйúAƬ

The result comes after 960 professors warned that UUK¡¯s proposal would lead to a recruitment ¡°disaster¡± for universities.

The letter, published in Times ÖйúAƬ, says that, in a sector where ¡°many would earn more in the private sector and which has a well-deserved reputation as ¡®world class¡¯, the USS pension has provided compensation for relatively modest salaries and has acted as a powerful magnet to talented staff from around the globe¡±.

Last week, the vice-chancellors of the University of Warwick and Loughborough University broke ranks to criticise UUK for failing to offer guaranteed retirement incomes for USS members.

Writing to Alistair Jarvis, UUK¡¯s chief executive, Warwick¡¯s vice-chancellor Stuart Croft urges the organisation, which represents the university, to look at ¡°less stark solutions¡±.

¡°I strongly believe that there is scope to look again at the technical provisions, to look at other benefit options ¨C such as full defined contribution options for those above the national pay scale (perhaps by opt-in) and the flexibility to offer defined contribution to others who would prefer a more flexible scheme ¨C and the deficit recovery period,¡± Professor Croft writes.

¡°A combination of these could sustain a meaningful defined benefit offering for those below the current salary threshold.¡±

A spokesman for the Universities and Colleges Employers Association highlighted that the number of UCU members voting in favour of strike action "represents an estimate of just 16 per cent of academic staff in those HE institutions and 12 per cent of active USS members?in?HE".

"The vast majority of?HE?employees?who are USS members?appear to?understand the reality of the current?funding?environment and the challenges facing the USS," the spokesman said. "Many have shown they do not support action that could harm both their institutions and their students.?

"It is for each individual, autonomous institution?to decide how best to deal with this industrial action and each will of course wish to protect their students¡¯ interests.¡±

sophie.inge@timeshighereducation.com

Institutions set to be affected by strike action

• University of Aberdeen
• Aberystwyth University
• Aston University
• Bangor University
• University of Bath
• Birkbeck, University of London
• University of Bristol
• Brunel University London
• University of Cambridge
• Cardiff University
• City, University of London
• Courtauld Institute of Art
• Cranfield University
• University of Dundee
• Durham University
• University of East Anglia
• University of Edinburgh
• University of Essex
• University of Exeter
• University of Glasgow
• Goldsmiths, University of London
• Heriot-Watt University
• University of the Highlands and Islands
• University of Hull
• Imperial College London
• Keele University
• University of Kent
• King's College London
• Lancaster University
• University of Leeds
• University of Leicester
• University of Liverpool
• Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
• London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
• Loughborough University
• University of Manchester
• Newcastle University
• University of Nottingham
• Open University
• University of Oxford
• Queen Mary University of London
• Queen¡¯s University Belfast
• University of Reading
• Royal Holloway, University of London
• Royal Veterinary College
• University of Salford
• Senate House, University of London
• University of Sheffield
• Soas, University of London
• University of Southampton
• University of St Andrews
• University of Stirling
• University of Strathclyde
• University of Surrey
• University of Sussex
• UCL
• UCL Institute of Education
• Ulster University
• University of Wales
• University of Warwick
• University of York

The 50 per cent turnout threshold required for any strike action was not met at the following institutions: University of Bradford; University of Birmingham; London School of Economics; Ruskin College; St George's, University of London; University of Suffolk; Swansea University.

ÖйúAƬ