Per-student grant funding for ÖйúAƬ providers in England has slumped by nearly a?fifth in the past three years, with smaller campuses and those in?London bearing the?brunt of?the most recent changes, data show.

show that it will allocate ?1.266?billion in recurrent grants to providers in 2021-22, an?increase of ?10?million (0.8?per cent) on the total originally announced?for the current academic year.

However, this funding is expected to support an increase of nearly 83,000 (7?per cent) in full-time equivalent student numbers, meaning that per-student funding has?shrunk by 11.3?per?cent.

OfS analysis shows that the unit of funding now stands at ?981 per?student, down from ?1,215 in 2018-19 ¨C a?drop of 19.3?per?cent.

ÖйúAƬ

Most of English universities¡¯ funding for teaching comes from tuition fees. But grant funding remains a significant source of income for some institutions.

Funding for the coming year has been reshaped by reforms ordered by Gavin Williamson, the education secretary, under which?cash awarded to institutions in the capital under a London weighting has been scrapped, and?allocations for courses in the creative and performing arts and media studies have been reduced by 50?per?cent.

ÖйúAƬ

In contrast, funding for high-cost subjects in areas such as the sciences has been increased. This means that larger institutions, which typically offer more of these courses, have been more likely to?see an overall increase in funding for next year.

For example, among institutions receiving more than ?5?million annually from the OfS, 57?get an increase, and 22?suffer?a?cut. In contrast, among providers?allocated less than ?1?million, 155?get a?cut, and only 53?get a?raise.

Because of larger institutions¡¯ bigger intakes, 72 per cent of OfS-fundable full-time equivalent students are at providers that get?a boost in recurrent funding next year.

The loss of the ?65?million total London weighting means that institutions in the capital have been particularly likely to see their overall funding shrink: 66 will receive less, compared with 12 that will get more.

ÖйúAƬ

Nationwide, 30 providers have had an increase of more than ?1?million, while 20 have had a reduction of more than ?1?million, the largest being?about ?5?million.

chris.havergal@timeshighereducation.com