When Sir Tim Lankester (Letters, June ) states that moving administration of the loan scheme to the private sector would provide "possibilities of achieving improved efficiencies in operating the loans scheme which would help to lower the longer-term costs", he is restating a view that has been widely broadcast. However, this view fails to differentiate between the characteristics of the scheme and the effectiveness of its administration.
The attempt to implement "twin track" (to introduce private-sector lenders alongside the Student Loans Company) failed because the private sector proposals were not considered value for money.
If this assessment is not to be seen as a negative view of any state-operated function which is adopted purely "on principle" , it should be demonstrated or dropped from the debate.
Colin Ward
Student Loans Company
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰’蝉 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login