The government has looked at expanding the public interest test on mergers to include scientific research and development, Vince Cable has told a cross-party group of MPs. ?

Mr Cable, the business secretary, told the House of Commons Business, Innovation and Skills Committee today that it was ¡°one of the options¡± the government had looked at as he was asked about US pharmaceutical company Pfizer¡¯s proposed takeover of AstraZeneca.

However, he added that this would need to be done within the constraints of the existing legal framework.

When asked by MPs whether the upcoming Parliamentary recess would affect any ability to act, Mr Cable said his understanding is that it would not, because the bid would be ¡°live¡± for some time.

ÖйúAƬ

Mr Cable added that the government is looking for assurances from Pfizer of a long-term commitment to research and development, employment, manufacturing and decision-making in the UK.

He added that Pfizer¡¯s pledge to keep 20 per cent of its research and development workforce in the UK is a ¡°basis for negotiation¡± and if conversations were to continue they would need to be ¡°meaningful and binding¡±.

ÖйúAƬ

When asked how he would make these assurances meaningful and binding, Mr Cable said this was an area he would ¡°rather not expose in too much detail¡±.

His appearance before the committee came after the chief executives of both Pfizer and AstraZeneca appeared before the same group of MPs.

Pascal Soriot, the head of AstraZeneca, warned that if the takeover went ahead it would create a huge ¡°distraction¡± that would threaten to undermine development work being done by the firm¡¯s scientists.

¡°Any distractions on work we are doing now could run the risk of delaying our drugs pipeline,¡± he said.

ÖйúAƬ

Meanwhile, Ian Read, chief executive of Pfizer, insisted that the proposal would be good for UK science. ¡°I think it will strengthen the scientific base in the UK, a company our size making these sorts of commitments,¡± he told the MPs.

holly.else@tsleducation.com