The Office for Students (OfS) will take over as England¡¯s ÖйúAƬ quality assessment body following the withdrawal of the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA), the government has confirmed.

In a written statement to Parliament , universities minister Robert Halfon confirmed that England¡¯s ÖйúAƬ watchdog would take the quality scrutiny role on an interim basis from 1 April ¡°pending further consideration of future arrangements¡±.

The decision follows the QAA¡¯s announcement in July 2022 that it wished to stop assessing ÖйúAƬ providers in England amid concerns over non-compliance with European standards in the new regulatory approach.

The current regulatory approach in England?¨C which does not require the QAA to publish all of its designated quality body (DQB) reports, include students on review teams or have a cyclical review process?¨C puts it at odds with standard international practice, set out in the European Standards and Guidelines.

ÖйúAƬ

As a result, the QAA's registration from the European Quality Assurance Register for ÖйúAƬ had been suspended and the QAA decided it could no longer meet both sets of requirements.

Announcing that the QAA would be delisted as England¡¯s designated quality body at the end of March, Mr Halfon explained the decision would likely cause significant concern within the sector, with an ¡°overall majority (31 of 47) of responses¡± to a recent consultation on the move disagreeing with de-designation of the QAA.

ÖйúAƬ

However, Universities UK and other representative bodies had indicated that they agreed with the removal of the QAA as the quality body, Mr Halfon added.

In addition, the OfS ¡°also supports QAA¡¯s request for its designation to be removed given that it has significant concerns about QAA¡¯s performance¡±, continued Mr Halfon, referring to a on the QAA¡¯s performance published by the OfS in January which claimed the body did not provide value for money for ÖйúAƬ providers and had failed to address potential conflicts of interest caused by its assessment of organisations who also subscribed to it, on a voluntary basis. Some of its reports, on which the OfS relied for regulatory decisions, were not ¡°consistently evidenced or focused on outcomes¡±, it added.

¡°Having considered the responses to the consultation, and QAA¡¯s decision to step down from the DQB role, I have concluded that QAA should be de-designated as DQB. I will therefore publish a notice to remove the designation with effect from 1 April 2023,¡± Mr Halfon continued.

While it was mooted last year that an alternative independent body might take over from the QAA, Mr Halfon confirmed that, in line with the ÖйúAƬ and Research Act 2017, the watchdog¡¯s role would revert to the OfS ¡°where no body is designated to perform the assessment functions¡±.

ÖйúAƬ

¡°The OfS has confirmed that, from 1 April 2023, it will undertake all quality and standards assessment activity on an interim basis pending further consideration of future arrangements,¡± he said, adding that the ¡°Department for Education, OfS and ÖйúAƬ stakeholders will work closely to consider options for long-term arrangements for the assessment of quality and standards¡±.

Vicki Stott, the QAA¡¯s chief executive, commented that ¡°the minister¡¯s statement naturally follows the difficult decision made last summer to withdraw our consent from being England¡¯s Designated Quality Body (DQB).¡±

¡°Our decision to demit the role was necessary due to our commitment to remaining registered with EQAR, something that was not consistent with the requirements made of the DQB,¡± added Ms Stott, who said the QAA would ¡°look forward to the new opportunities for our work in England that will result from this change alongside our ongoing work in the other UK nations and internationally¡±.

jack.grove@timeshighereducation.com