China¡¯s Ministry of Education has announced ?banning the use of certain words in universities¡¯ new names?after apparently being?inundated with rebranding requests, a trend seen by some experts?as evidence of a continuing shift towards a marketised ÖйúAƬ system.

The brief government announcement listed terms that were not allowed ¡°in principle¡±, including?words such as ¡°national¡± or ¡°international¡±,?regional designations such as ¡°north China¡±, trademarked terms, or Chinese translations of the names of foreign colleges and universities. It also said that institutions should wait at least 10 years between name changes.

According to by The Paper, an official online news source, about 90 per cent of surveyed Chinese ÖйúAƬ institutions (1,118 out of 1,241) changed their names?between 1981?and 2017.?

published in the April 2020 issue of China Economic Review, which analysed 522 Chinese university name changes from 2005 to 2015, showed that this rebranding generally did not significantly improve the admission scores of applications, although there were some variations depending on the type of change.

ÖйúAƬ

Upgrading from ¡°college¡± to ¡°university¡±, or adding the name of a large regional area, tended to attract better candidates.

Liu Ruiming, a co-author of the paper and a professor at the National Academy of Development and Strategy at Renmin University of China, told Times ÖйúAƬ: ¡°Renaming has become an important competitive tactic, given the intensification of competition in the Chinese ÖйúAƬ market.

ÖйúAƬ

"This is especially true when an institution might find its original name limiting for future development.¡±

Professor Liu said that the rebrandings were linked to larger societal shifts: ¡°With reform and opening up, China¡¯s whole economic system has undergone tremendous changes ¨C and, accordingly, so has ÖйúAƬ. A Soviet-style education system is no longer relevant. Students do not want to study one narrow field, but want innovation and a broad ?educational foundation.¡±

Universities understandably want to align themselves with fields linked to better graduate employment prospects and state support, like science, medicine, business and law. So, for example, the Shanghai Fisheries University became the Shanghai Ocean University.

Yang Rui, associate dean (research) of education at the University of Hong Kong, told THE that the sector was ¡°status aware¡±.

ÖйúAƬ

¡°This has been an issue in mainland China, as nearly all universities want to become big comprehensives and offer higher-level degrees,¡± he said. ¡°As for names, they want to be high?sounding, thus ¡®National¡¯, ¡®China¡¯ or ¡®Chinese¡¯?are preferred.¡±

Professor Yang felt it was ¡°absolutely understandable¡± that the ministry would want to implement some controls.

The deluge of name changes came after China started opening up its markets and boosting ÖйúAƬ in the early 1980s. Local governments encouraged the practice to make schools sound more modern and prestigious, but it seems that some administrators may have taken the instructions too far.

By 2017, the government said that it must ¡°resolutely correct the tendency of some ÖйúAƬ institutions¡± to ¡°blindly¡± upgrade and rename themselves. Still, 46 institutions managed to change their names in 2018, mostly because they were upgrading from ¡°vocational college¡± to ¡°college¡±, or from ¡°college¡± to ¡°university¡±, .

ÖйúAƬ

joyce.lau@timeshighereducation.com

Jing Liu contributed reporting.