Browse the full results of the Impact Rankings 2024

This ranking explores universities¡¯ research on life on?land and their education on and support for land ecosystems.

View the?methodology for the Impact Rankings 2024?to find out how these data are used in the overall ranking.

Metrics

Research on land ecosystems (27%)

• Proportion of papers in the top 10 per cent of?journals as defined by Citescore (10%)
• Field-weighted citation index of papers produced by?the university (10%)
• Number of publications (7%)

This focuses on research that is relevant to life on land. The field-weighted citation index is a subject-normalised score of the citation performance of publications.

The data are provided by Elsevier¡¯s Scopus dataset, based on a query of keywords associated with SDG?15 (life on land) and supplemented by additional publications identified by artificial intelligence. The dataset includes all indexed publications between 2018 and 2022. The data are normalised across the range using Z-scoring.

ÖйúAƬ

Supporting land ecosystems through education (23%)

• Support or organise events aimed to promote conservation and sustainable use of land (4.6%)
• Policy to ensure that food on campus is sustainably farmed (4.6%)
• Maintain and extend existing ecosystems and their biodiversity (4.6%)
• Educational programmes on ecosystems for local or?national communities (4.6%)
• Educational programmes or outreach on sustainable management of land for agriculture and tourism (4.6%)

The evidence was provided directly by universities, evaluated and scored by?THE?and not normalised.

Supporting land ecosystems through action (27%)

• Policy to ensure the conservation, restoration and sustainable use of land ecosystems associated with the university (5.4%)
• Policy to identify, monitor and protect threatened species affected by the operation of the university (5.4%)
• Include local biodiversity in any planning and development processes ¨C for example, construction of new buildings (5.4%)
• Policy to reduce impact of non-native species on?campus (5.4%)
• Collaborate with local community to maintain shared land ecosystems (5.4%)

The evidence was provided directly by universities, evaluated and scored by?THE?and not normalised.

ÖйúAƬ

Land-sensitive waste disposal (23%)

• Water quality standards and guidelines for water discharges (7.7%)
• Policy on reducing plastic waste on campus (7.65%)
• Policy on waste disposal, covering hazardous materials (7.65%)

The evidence was provided directly by universities, evaluated and scored by?THE?and not normalised.

Evidence

When we ask about policies and initiatives ¨C for example, the existence of mentoring programmes ¨C our metrics require universities to provide the evidence to support their claims. In these cases, we give credit for the evidence, and for the evidence being public. These metrics are not usually size-normalised.

Evidence is evaluated against a set of criteria, and decisions are cross-validated where there is uncertainty. Evidence need not be exhaustive ¨C we are looking for examples that demonstrate best practice at the institutions concerned.

Time frame

In general, the data used refer to the closest academic year to January to December 2022. The date range for each metric is specified in the full methodology document.

ÖйúAƬ

Exclusions

The ranking is open to any university that teaches at undergraduate or postgraduate level. Although research activities form part of the method?ology, there is no?minimum research requirement for participation.

THE?reserves the right to exclude universities that it believes have falsified data, or are no longer in good standing.

Data collection

Institutions provide and sign off their institutional data for use in the rankings. On the rare occasions when a particular data point is not provided, we enter a value of zero.