I am surprised Arthur C. Clarke seems unaware of The Double Helix (1968) by James Watson (Books, THES , November 14) when he says that "there are few examples of a great breakthrough in science being described by one of its participants", especially when the areas of these breakthroughs are one and the same, with the roles of Watson and Maurice Wilkins overlapping. He does, however, mention the inclusion by Wilkins of Rosalind Franklin, who died and was thus unable to share in the Nobel prize.
Philip Bradfield University of Wolverhampton
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰’蝉 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login