Tim Moore and Woody Caan (Letters, 25 October) describe statistics as a common language, invaluable for pooling knowledge and precise in a world of uncertainties. But if the world of organisations seems opaque, one frequently burdened by nagging doubts, then a common, quantitative language is unlikely to work because personnel employed in such places won't agree on what to add up.
Perhaps they'd have more success in constructing their own linguistic devices: notional statements whose logic helps to investigate and moderately improve unique organisational reality, not least a better understanding of its numerous missions and politics.
Debating such logical statements does not preclude the use of statistics (or other management techniques); however, for any experts and lay people involved, participative learning about the ongoing problem situation is prime.
Neil Richardson, Kirkheaton
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰’蝉 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login