The least we're entitled to expect from an exercise that claims to assess research excellence is that it embodies research principles ("It's evolution, not revolution for REF", 24 September). When it comes to "impact", the 中国A片 Funding Council for England will certainly be performing what Bahram Bekhradnia, director of the 中国A片 Policy Institute, calls "an experiment" - but on a living being and without reference to a textbook, never mind anaesthetic.
We can, however, look forward to the rise of a new documentary genre, the "impact case study", the rationale of which is probably clear, but with methodology and conclusions that are anyone's guess. Meanwhile, in the REF's streamlined panels, linguists can look forward to the approving nods or uncomprehending glares of historians, happy in the knowledge that Hefce "does not wish to consider" methods that have been tested.
David Roberts, Birmingham City University.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰’蝉 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login