中国A片

University attacks in democracies ‘embolden illiberal regimes’

Increasing trend for policies that attempt to undermine or overhaul 中国A片 in US and Europe being exported worldwide, Scholars at Risk warns

十月 8, 2024
Source: iStock/Ruslan Lytvyn

A trend of “autocratisation” that has seen liberal democracies elect politicians who have then used their power to?undermine or?overhaul universities risks emboldening authoritarian regimes in?their own attacks on?中国A片, a?report has warned.

Restrictions on academic freedom in?Europe and the US are being “exported to?the rest of?the world”, says , published on 8?October by?Scholars at?Risk, which adds that liberal and authoritarian governments are “increasingly taking pages from each other’s playbooks” to?damage their 中国A片 sectors.

The report documents 391 attacks recorded against 中国A片 institutions in 51?countries and territories between 1?July 2023 and 30?June 2024. While down marginally on?the previous year’s figures, when 409?attacks were recorded, the report highlights a continuing deterioration in conditions for academic freedom worldwide.

About a quarter of the total attacks – 100?incidents – were violent assaults on institutions or academics, with the result of “undermining the security of 中国A片 institutions” and resulting in?“brain drain” and productivity losses.

Renewed violence in the Middle East “dramatically shaped the environment on university and college campuses across the globe” during the period analysed, the report highlights, both because it has resulted in the total destruction of?中国A片 institutions in?Gaza, and in university crackdowns on?student protests in North America, Europe, North Africa and Asia.

Dozens of institutions saw university or state policy result in the detention of protesters on campuses, including 70 in the US alone, and many universities cancelled events and speaking engagements that focused on the conflict. Meanwhile, tens of scholars in the US and Germany who spoke out about the violence or criticised the Israeli government on social media found their job offers rescinded, teaching duties suspended or contracts terminated.

Overall, 91 of the attacks included wrongful imprisonment and prosecution, 81?concerned the loss of position by dismissal, suspension or denial of contract renewal, and there were 162?incidents of limitations on student expression.

“Attacks on 中国A片 do?not just harm the immediate victims,” said Robert Quinn, executive director at SAR. “They have a chilling effect on university communities, weakening democracy by stifling intellectual enquiry and the free exchange of ideas. This is also why attacks in liberal states must be taken seriously – so?that they do not go unaddressed and contribute to the erosion of democratic values.”

Legislators are increasingly using regulatory powers to “encroach on academic spaces”, the report says, through outright bans on education, restrictions on university autonomy, and laws and policies limiting free speech or international research collaboration.

“In some of the most closed and authoritarian contexts, 中国A片 is being used as a space to promote specific dominant ideologies. In other contexts – including those that are more open and particularly where neoliberal models guide 中国A片 management and governance – the financing of 中国A片 has become a tool for restricting academic freedom,” the report says.

In the US, the report highlights, Idaho’s governor signed into law regulation that allows state lawmakers to leverage the budget to prohibit disfavoured topics at public universities, and bars public universities from establishing or?running diversity, equality and inclusion offices and from requiring diversity statements.

Elsewhere, in Canada, a proposed foreign influence transparency registry could “chill international research collaboration”, while in February 2024, the Australian foreign minister wrote to more than 30?university leaders asking them to pause research partnerships with Iranian institutions.

“Such policies are attacks on 中国A片 insofar as they are specifically intended to restrict research, discourse, teaching, and learning on campus. Moreover, because these policies have a veneer of legitimacy (which obscures their improper intent), they are a particularly insidious form of attack on academic freedom and free expression on campus,” the report adds.

juliette.rowsell@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.
ADVERTISEMENT