中国A片

Union fears ‘disastrous consequences’ of Sheffield restructure

Staff complain over lack of consultation on proposed creation of new schools

十月 13, 2023
Sheffield, United Kingdom - September 25, 2023 The Hicks Building, The University of Sheffield. The Hicks Building houses the Departments of Physics and Astronomy and the School of Mathematics and Statistics.
Source: iStock

The University of Sheffield has been urged by a union to pause its planned restructuring and consult staff, or risk “disastrous consequences”.

Koen Lamberts, Sheffield’s vice-chancellor, informed staff this week that the institution was planning on creating a “new school structure”, reducing the number of academic departments and creating more evenly sized schools.

In an all-staff meeting the next day, senior management reportedly said they could not guarantee there would not be any redundancies.

The university told Times 中国A片 that there were no anticipated academic redundancies as part of the new school structure.

Robyn Orfitelli, president of the Sheffield branch of the University and College Union, said there have been more than 20 restructures at the institution since 2019.

“University management has not taken the time to slow down to properly evaluate whether these restructures have led to positive or negative changes before moving onto the next one, and now are subjecting the entire university to a change management process which will cause a remarkable level of stress and job uncertainty,” she said.

Sheffield’s proposals are due to be presented to the university senate on 13 December. Unions were told about the plans one hour before Professor Lamberts’ email was received by staff, on World Mental Health day.

Dr Orfitelli, a lecturer in linguistics, said the proposed groupings of academic disciplines in the schools had not been the subject of input from staff in these areas.

“A change of this magnitude will impact every single staff member and student of this university, and the only acceptable next step is to pause, seek meaningful feedback from staff and students, and to resubmit a revised version to full, proper review under our governance structures,” Dr Orfitelli said.

“Anything less than that risks disastrous consequences for this university.”

In his email, Professor Lamberts said little strategic thought was given?to the creation to the size and shape of departments in 2008-09, which has led to inconsistencies and unevenness across the institution.

“In some parts of the university, large student intakes and the associated workload make it difficult to maintain research excellence,” he said.

He said bringing together some departments within the five faculties – engineering, science, health, arts and humanities and social sciences – to create larger schools would reduce bureaucracy for staff, and ensure equal support across the university.

“This decision is not about saving costs – it is about making improvements for the future that benefit our staff and students,” the vice-chancellor said.

Meredith Warren, a senior lecturer in biblical and religious studies, said Professor Lamberts had caused “a lot of worry and anxiety among staff and students”, and done so at the busiest time of year.

“His callous treatment of staff and students during the recent industrial action is matched in how he has unilaterally decided to force through major unnecessary changes, which will impact every member of the university,” said Dr Warren.

“It also seems like he has tried to circumvent the democratic processes at the university for his own aims.

“We've just been on strike for workload issues, so I can’t see how reducing staff numbers will do anything but make the problem worse.”

According to its most recent financial statements, the university posted a deficit of ?72 million in 2021-22.

In his letter, Professor Lamberts wrote that the new structure would be implemented in phases over the next two years – with some schools being in place for 2024-25 and some for 2025-26.

Professor Lamberts told?THE?that the university was?“currently seeking views from our staff on the proposed new structure”. He said that?the changes would not affect how courses are delivered and students will continue to study as normal.

patrick.jack@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.

Reader's comments (2)

The University of Sheffield's finances are much rosier than the article makes it seem. The deficit quoted includes costs relating to movements due to the USS pension scheme deficit (now disappeared), and isn't representative of performance. The underlying results which are more representative show a ?56m surplus for the year, and net cash generation of ?140m. Full details available here: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/finance/annual-report-financial-statements
We have seen this movie before. UK universities appear to be fanatically enamoured with the 'super faculty' model. The end result is always the same. More command and control from the centre. More power to the administrative class at the expense of the academic staff (look out for the expansion of administrative titles). The creation of more distance from those generating the rents associated with teaching, research and grant making and those controlling budgets (hence more rent seeking by administrative units at the expense of academic support). Ultimately, the 'super faculty' model reduces the number of line reports to the VC and give power to those in DVC and PVC roles, creating something of a royal VC. Any good manager can manage multiple reporting units and corporate CEOs and COOs hand far more reports of massively larger size than your typical VC.
ADVERTISEMENT