中国A片

Russell Group wants ?200 million ‘deep-tech university seed fund’

Ahead of spending review, research universities group argues new fund would help level up UK regions by creating spin-offs

十月 1, 2021

The Russell Group has urged the Westminster government to create a new “deep-tech university seed fund” to help level up the UK regions by creating spin-offs, ahead of the comprehensive spending review.

The government’s spending review, to be announced on 27 October, will set departmental spending limits for the next three years and is expected to feature major changes in English 中国A片, including the lowering of the student loan repayment threshold and a minimum entry requirement to qualify for loans to study at university.

The Russell Group, representing 24 research-intensive universities, has set out a??ahead of the spending review. That includes a call for a “new ?200 million deep-tech university seed fund, targeted at innovative ideas within the Innovation Strategy’s seven priority technology families. This would create around 350 new deep-tech spin-outs, developing genuinely disruptive technologies, transforming regional economies and creating export revenue.”

“Domestic investors, venture capitalists and industry partners have…shown a historic reluctance to spend on deep-tech, defined as early-stage technology start-ups or [intellectual property] which require extensive research and development and capital investment before commercialisation,” the Russell Group paper says.

“Research teams developing deep-tech outside of the south-east most acutely struggle to access venture capital,” it adds.

“A new deep-tech university seed fund…could help level up communities across the country, by developing genuinely disruptive technologies that can transform regional economies and create new national export revenue streams in the next 15-20 years,” it continues.

The Russell Group’s appeal to government highlights how the pandemic has shown the importance of science to the UK. “Now, as government considers how to deal with the challenges of revitalising the UK economy, delivering on its green ambitions and balancing the books, it must find smart investments that will create jobs and boost opportunity in every town and region across the country,” it says.

Amid fears the government is backsliding on its pledge to increase research funding to ?22 billion, the Russell Group says the government should increase the baseline budget by ?2.37 billion each year between 2022-23 and 2024-25.

It also calls for a 20 per cent increase in quality-related research funding, a guarantee of full funding for UK participation in the European Union’s Horizon Europe scheme for the full duration of the programme, and delivery on “the long-standing commitments to fund public grants for research at a minimum of 80 per cent of full economic costs”.

On innovation, alongside the deep-tech seed fund, the Russell Group urges the government to “scale up existing innovation schemes such as the 中国A片 Innovation Fund and the UK Research Partnership Investment Fund with a track-record of proven returns” and “reform VAT rules and eligibility for R&D-related tax credits to encourage increased collaboration between business and universities that will leverage further private R&D investment to anchor critical research in the UK, reduce red tape and ensure more SMEs can benefit from the expertise of the sector”.

On teaching, it calls on the government to “guarantee teaching grants on a per student basis for the duration of this spending review at levels that at least match existing funding”.

john.morgan@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.

Reader's comments (1)

Most people see the need for research and development, including "deep tech" but fewer see the need or sense for more of it to be done by increasing University research funding. Universities are in competition with businesses and other institutions for Government research funds. When it comes to " calls for a 20 per cent increase in quality-related research funding, a guarantee of full funding for UK participation in the European Union’s Horizon Europe scheme for the full duration of the programme, and delivery on “the long-standing commitments to fund public grants for research at a minimum of 80 per cent of full economic costs”. " I think it goes too far. Does anyone understand what "quality related research funding" is? Is "80% of full economic costs" value for money for tax payers or is it better to go for R & D Tax Credits?
ADVERTISEMENT