Growing in the heart of the world’s deepest valley are two plants that have fooled scientists for decades.
Two species of the ‘touch-me-not’ genus (Impatiens) – the Blue Diamond (Impatiens namchabarwensis) and Toothed Busy Lizzie (Impatiens arguta)?are found in the remote Tsangpo Gorge that meanders around the highest peak in the Eastern Himalayas, Mount Namchabarwa.
Both plants are adorned with trumpet-shaped flowers in a spectrum of colours, and their similarities made many scientists believe they belonged to the same species.
But on this occasion, the experts were wrong.
In a recent study published in the?, researchers from in China and the University of Bonn?in Germany have identified some vital differences between the plants that disentangle their classification and confirm they are separate species.
齿闯罢尝鲍’蝉 , a corresponding author of the study, says: “We are facing a mass extinction of species worldwide, so it is essential to recognise every species and their distribution patterns.
“A species of plant can have flowers with many different colours; just think of the pink and white of a common daisy. So it can be challenging to differentiate between species with similar shapes and habitats, such as?I. namchabarwensis?and?I. arguta. But we have now shown they are pollinated by different insects and have more differences than previously thought.
“Our findings are a small piece in the species identification and distribution puzzle, but plants such as?I. namchabarwensis, which are only found in narrow habitats, are often particularly interesting for conservation programmes.”
Due to the uncertainty regarding its taxonomy, the study reports that?I. namchabarwensis?has been neglected by existing literature, including the standard compilation of all known plant species found in China, Flora of China.
A name of its own
Impatiens namchabarwensis?was found in 2003 during an excursion to the Eastern Himalaya mountain range and described as a new species in 2005. It quickly circulated in Western countries as a novelty for gardeners who collect species of ‘touch-me-nots’, especially due to its appealing colours.
As the valley where it was discovered is also the habitat of the widespread species?I. arguta, many scientists believed the two plants to be one species.
Typical flowers of I. namchabarwensis (left) and I. arguta (right) in front view (A), side views (C and D), and dissected (B). Pictures of I. namchabarwensis were taken from a cultivated plant at Zurich Botanical Garden, Germany, by René Stalder. Pictures of I. arguta were taken from a cultivated plant at the Botanical Garden of Bonn by Stefan Abrahamczyk.
Dr Steudel explains: “Every year, new species of plants, animals, and microbes are identified. Sometimes these new species and their suggested names are not accepted by other researchers. They think the organism belongs to an already-known species and consider the new name just an alternative. This process is called synonymisation.
“Synonymisation is very important; otherwise, everybody would know the species by a different name and communication between experts would be very difficult.”
Despite the value of synonymisation, in some cases, the plants are indeed different species and therefore earn the right to a new name. The Blue Diamond (I. namchabarwensis) is such an example.
The researchers observed that?I. namchabarwensis?is pollinated by hawk moths and tends to live for two to three years, whereas?I. arguta?is preferred by bumblebees and lives for eight years. They suggest the difference in pollinators is due to the lower petals of the plants facing in slightly different directions;?I. arguta?creates a platform for its flower visitors with horizontal petals, in contrast to the downward-facing leaves of the?I. namchabarwensis.?
Dr Steudel explains the impact of identifying these differences: “It would be a real pity if such a beautiful species as?I. namchabarwensis?were confined to survive only in collections and be extinct in nature.
“But it would be even worse if all knowledge of the plant species went extinct as well, because it was misclassified.”
The study,?Impatiens namchabarwensis?is distinct from?I. arguta, is published in the Nordic Journal of Botany and can be read?.
