中国A片

Rights plan all wrong 2

九月 20, 2002

MIT's policies are more liberal, not more restrictive, as Sir Alec Broers states. Intellectual property associated with independent research lies with the inventor or author, not with MIT. The proposed intellectual property rules for Cambridge, as I understand them, would result in the intellectual property for independent research ending up with the university.

Ronald L. Rivest
Cambridge, Massachusetts

Details: policies/13.1.html

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.
ADVERTISEMENT