中国A片

Clothing Poverty: The Hidden World of Fast Fashion and Second-Hand Clothes, by Andrew Brooks

A wide-ranging examination of garment recycling should whet the appetite of readers for more research on the subject, says Ruth Pearson

四月 9, 2015

In this interesting and important account, geographer Andrew Brooks shines a light on a generally ignored subject: the ways in which second-hand clothes, many of them donated to charity shops in the UK and North America, are fuelling a sophisticated and complex global network.

Brooks bases his analysis on fieldwork undertaken for his doctoral thesis that explored the labyrinthine commercial networks that deliver our used – or simply discarded – garments into the hands of people in some of the world’s poorest countries. He follows the stories of traders and consumers in bustling markets in Mozambique where he completed his empirical research, supplemented by additional research in Papua New Guinea, Nigeria and Zambia, illustrating the ways in which bales of used clothing are sorted, repaired, ironed and (re)presented to people whose income and precarious employment make the purchase of new ready-made garments for themselves and their families unthinkable. The “fast fashion” shopping habits of the UK and other countries are a central driver in this burgeoning trade, which has, according to Brooks, displaced the post-independence indigenous textile and garments sectors in sub-Saharan Africa. It is a truly global production network: from “Americans, Canadians, Britons and other Europeans to Mozambique, spanning North and South America, connecting Europe with East and West Africa and stretching across Asia and around the Pacific”.

Earlier studies have provided detailed mapping of second-hand clothing markets, including the work of Karen Hansen on Zambia, Sally Baden and Catherine Barber on West Africa, and Lynn Milligram on the Philippines. But Brooks’ research goes beyond individual case studies. In one of this book’s most fascinating chapters, “The shadow world of used clothing”, he throws light on the UK end of the used-clothing supply chain. He points out the contradictions between Oxfam’s Wastesaver sorting and export plant in Yorkshire and the charity’s global role as an anti-poverty campaigning and development organisation. Oxfam has tried to address this issue by establishing a processing and sorting social enterprise in Senegal to circumvent commercial profiteering agents and middlemen; but, as Brooks points out, it is a distinctly small-scale response.

Clothing Poverty aims to set second-hand clothing supply chains within the context of persistent poverty in sub-Saharan Africa – hence its overview chapters on the garment sector and its role in industrialisation both historically and in the contemporary global economy, an analysis of the history of cotton production although not of synthetic and other natural fibres and fabrics, and the political and economic background of Mozambique. Brooks also provides an introductory chapter entitled “A biography of jeans”, which illustrates the multiple roles of items of clothing that serve simultaneously as utilitarian workfare, protective garments and class and cultural signifiers, and he observes that the designated meaning sought by the wearer does not transfer directly to the new owners of these “pre-loved” garments – local, cultural, social, classed and gendered context is all.

Brooks expresses his disappointment with the remedies for this entrenched and exploitative global trading sector, arguing that innovative projects to promote African clothing entrepreneurs “are unlikely to lead to widespread poverty alleviation” – a conclusion informed by his analysis of the trade liberalisation and economic deregulation in the clothing sector spearheaded by the World Trade Organisation. He is also disappointed with ethical and fair trade initiatives, pointing to the reality in development policy and practice that alterations in global capital accumulation require more than innovation in a single sector or location. Although it is aimed at the general reader, Brooks’ wide-ranging examination of the subject should whet the appetite of readers from a variety of disciplines for more systematic research on this intriguing but little-known aspect of globalisation.

Clothing Poverty: The Hidden World of Fast Fashion and Second-Hand Clothes

By Andrew Brooks
Zed Books, 296pp, ?65.00 and ?14.99
ISBN 9781783600687, 0670 and 0694 (e-book)
Published 12 February 2015

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.

Reader's comments (2)

The used clothing industry is not hidden. There have been various TV/radio and newspaper features and it employs tens of millions of people worldwide. For anyone who is interested it only takes a few seconds to find reams of information about this valuable and crucial industry. Although used clothing is popular in Sub-Saharan Africa, to blame it for textile production failures in Africa is a red herring. Used clothing has been popular since the 1980s and during that time textile producers in Africa have prospered. However in recent years, they have been struggling, because like textile producers in Europe, they have not been able to compete with cheap Asian imports (particularly from China) which are often sold at the same or cheaper prices than used clothing. The phasing out of the Multi-Fibre Agreement (MFA) in 2005 was also disastrous for African textile producers. Under the MFA limits were placed on the amount of textiles that any country could export to developing countries. This largely protected the African producers at the expense of the Chinese. Since this has been phased out it has been extremely difficult for African producers to compete on the global market. In addition, a totally unreliable electricity supply and inadequate infrastructure together with difficulties in sourcing of raw materials makes it virtually impossible for textile producers in Africa to compete. So whilst it is tempting to portray the relative success of the used clothing industry as a scapegoat, there are numerous compelling reasons which show that this is simply not the case and does a great dis-service to everyone concern, including textile producers.
this maybe a so called scapegoat but the fact is our unwanted clothing instead of being in landfill are now some other countrys problem. is it really fair to dispose of our fast fashion from china in this way. not only are our companys sourcing cheap labour from overseas which inturn takes labour from our industry.but it also takes from the local textile industries of the countries we dump our clothing as their customers buy our cheap rubbish at high prices. there has to be better ways to recycle unwanted clothing. i currently upcycle clothing into yarn to weave with and you can now buy tshirt yarn to knit with. we need to be more responsible and considerer all outcomes before we act.
ADVERTISEMENT