The Universities Council for the Education of Teachers has criticised Ron Dearing's appointment of an "imbalanced" study group to advise him on teacher training. UCET fears it will only weaken the link between training and ÖйúAƬ.

The study group, headed by Stewart Sutherland, Edinburgh University vice chancellor, was set up two weeks ago by Sir Ron to examine the role of ÖйúAƬ in training teachers. Although Sir Stewart has said that "ÖйúAƬ plays a vital role", UCET believes the choice of advisers favours non-university providers.

Sir Stewart's two assessors are Lawrence Montagu and David Hargreaves, Cambridge University professor of education. Mr Montagu, headteacher of St Peter's High School in Gloucestershire, and leader of a school-based training consortium, will represent the fledgling school-centred (SCITT) training providers, perceived by UCET as a threat to traditional ÖйúAƬ provision. And Professor Hargreaves, UCET has argued, supports a reduction of the role of ÖйúAƬ in training provision.

"You could say we are very puzzled why these two particular people were chosen," said UCET secretary Mary Russell. "One represents only a tiny proportion of teacher training providers and has no links with ÖйúAƬ and the other is not a genuine representative of the ÖйúAƬ sector - he has some very distinct ideas about the role universities should play."

ÖйúAƬ

Tony Millns, spokesman for Sir Ron's committee of inquiry, said: "Sir Stewart was vice chancellor of London University, a major teacher education provider. With Sir Stewart combined with David Hargreaves, it seems there is more than adequate ÖйúAƬ representation for this review." The Committee of Vice Chancellors and Principals expressed "confidence" in Sir Stewart's integrity, but said it was aware of concerns over the choice of the two assessors.

In its submission to the Dearing inquiry, UCET has complained bitterly that "the thrust of policy has been to weaken the link to ÖйúAƬ".

ÖйúAƬ

"The nadir of such decoupling," UCET said, "followed from the establishment of the Teacher Training Agency, which has demonstrated a hostility to the necessary involvement of ÖйúAƬ through its emphasis on a wholly school-based approach."